Q Acoustics M2 review

A reduced sound base that sounds little against the opposition



The Good / The Q Acoustics M2 sounds route superior to the speakers on your TV. The construct quality is great and the quantity of sources of info offered is useful at the cost.

The Bad / The sound of the Q Acoustics M2 is very obliged, even contrasted with units in its value run. It does not have the subwoofer yield that would help give some oomph, and there’s no HDMI exchanging.

The Bottom Line / The Q Acoustics M2 is a smaller sound base with clean sonics and a convenient HDMI association, however contending units convey more effect for home theater.


his chance a year ago we were prepared to discount sound bases: most TVs didn’t fit on them any longer, and sound bars let you update with a subwoofer, a way apparently shut to their bigger kin.

At that point, along came Sonos Playbase ($699 at Amazon.com), which sounds superior to numerous sound bars and ‘bases. With a reestablished thankfulness for the “speaker you can thud a TV on” classification comes items like the Q Acoustics M2. While it’s not as “extravagant” as the Sonos item it figures out how to be both a mess less expensive and ready to offer one imperative component the Playbase can’t: HDMI. Yet, how does the Q Acoustics analyze against items its own size, similar to the reasonable Fluance A40?

At $349, the M2 is solidly in the midrange of TV speakers, and is genuinely amiable at the cost. Like the organization’s comparatively evaluated M4 before it, the M2 shuns great searches for execution, however the M4 sounds somewhat better. In case you’re determined to a sound base however, our most loved non-Sonos decision is the less expensive Fluance AB40, which offers far superior sonic abilities.

The M2 is accessible now for $349, £299 or AU$549.

Smaller, with HDMI


The M2 is a smaller sound base that sort of looks like a backgammon dice glass face to face – it’s a long, rectangular tube with adjusted edges. At 21.6 inches (550mm) wide and 3.6 inches (93mm) tall, it will oblige most medium-sized TVs (up to 55 pounds (25 kg)). Remember if your TV has legs at each end, instead of a platform, the M2 may be excessively tall, making it impossible to fit under it. It’s intended for the TV to sit on it.

The soundbase highlights the same Balanced Mode Radiator (BMR) drivers as the Media 4 ($339.99 at Amazon Marketplace) notwithstanding a rectangular, 6-inch bass driver and these are driven by a 80-watt enhancer. Not at all like the M4, the M2 does not have the capacity to include a subwoofer later.


Where the M2 trumps its bigger sibling is in the capacity to associate your TV to it through HDMI ARC – your TV, particularly if it’s cheap, will probably have HDMI out than optical out, the option. It gives you a chance to hear your flatscreen’s installed sound, yet it won’t work with sources, for example, a Blu-beam player, as delegates for Q Acoustics affirmed, so you’ll need to keep them connected to your TV. The M2 offers Bluetooth, optical advanced, USB, stereo RCA and a 3.5mm info. The back likewise incorporates a manual three-mode EQ change to consider diverse situations, including putting the unit inside a bureau.

There’s a source select and control flip on the highest point of the speaker, nearby volume catches. The M2 additionally transports with a charge card shape remote with at least controls – the organization prescribes utilizing your TV’s remote.

How can it sound?

The Q Acoustics M2 amplifies detail and explanation, however needs punch. Q Acoustics guarantees the M2’s BMR drivers convey 180-degree, room-filling sound, however that wasn’t probable for us. The M2’s soundstage just spread marginally more extensive than the speaker bureau.

That was anything but a constraining component when we observed calm, discourse driven shows, for example, the biopic “Ruler of the Desert,” when the M2 was a joy to utilize. Nicole Kidman’s portrayal sounded great.


Raising the stakes with “Symbol,” the M2 still sounded clear, yet spatially little and ailing in affect. When we exchanged it for the to some degree bigger, however significantly less expensive ($249) Fluance AB40 sound base, quality made strides. Presently the soundstage spread over the front mass of the CR listening room, and the tonal adjust warmed up. The two bases’ sounds were total inverses: The M2 was clear, yet spatially confined; the AB40’s sound was wide and tonally fleshed out. The AB40 is considerably greater in estimate, estimating 3.9 inches high, 26 inches wide and 14 inches down. So if a littler impression is a need, the M2 will be a superior approach.

Coming back to the M2, we tinkered with its MoviEQ handling with expectations of cajoling more oomph from the soundbase, however the AB40’s sonic haul still bested the M2’s.

We next tuned in to music on the “From the Basement” best-of accumulation from the UK TV arrangement, and the M2 played noisy without strain, and elements were exuberant. Radiohead and PJ Harvey’s music sounded valid over the M2, that much was clear, however again the Fluance AB40‘s more noteworthy gravitas trounced the M2’s sound.

We set the M2 against its bigger M4 partner with the film “Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets.” In the market scene, an expansive puppy mammoth seeks after the legends through curving roads, at that point over the planet and past. The M2 sounded a little confined contrasted with the M4, which sounded greater and more powerful. The automatic rifle blasts and the hints of teeth ripping steel basically had more space to extend on the M4. Now, the M4 was at that point ahead, yet we found that on the off chance that we included a sub – something you can’t improve the situation the M2 – there was no challenge: the M4 is the better item.

Would it be a good idea for you to get it?

At last we regarded the Q Acoustics M2 for its unmistakable voice, and preferred its reduced size, however we needed more than it conveyed. Gone up against its own, the M2 sounds fine, and few out of every odd sound base purchaser is looking for a major, sturdy sound. For those people, the M2 merits solid thought for its usability, clean measurements and low-twisting sound.

For the cash, however, we’d recommend taking a gander at the Q Acoustics M4, Fluance A40 or even the Zvox Soundbase 670 (which at $350 is currently $150 less expensive than when it propelled).



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here